Home |
Categories | ABCD |
Link to us:
Add your Blog:
TagCloud
|
 |
Aggregator | News River | All Tags
| Lohan's Lesbian Love Triangle | |
We told y'all last month that saMAN Ronson was not Lindsay Lohan's first lesbian love.
Mogul spawn Courtenay Semel was La Lohan's first sapphic gal pal and the UK's News of the World has revealed details about their drama-filled relationship!
At one point, Lohan was in the middle of a love triangle, with Ronson on one side [...] | 
We told y'all last month that saMAN Ronson was not Lindsay Lohan's first lesbian love.
Mogul spawn Courtenay Semel was La Lohan's first sapphic gal pal and the UK's News of the World has revealed details about their drama-filled relationship!
At one point, Lohan was in the middle of a love triangle, with Ronson on one side and Semel on the other.
Scandalous!
Courtenay must feel so…used! Lindsay now does little to disguise in public her feelings for Manâbut this is only after months of covert gay experiments with Semel.
A friend (probably Courtenay herself) reveals to the NOTW that Semel said:
"Everyone thinks Samantha is Lindsayâs first lesbian love, but we were very passionate until her fear of being found out drove us apart. At the time she was terrified her career would be over if she revealed her sexual tendencies. But then Samantha came on to the scene and I was dropped.â
LezLo met Semel at a 2006 Malibu summer beach party.
Courtenay's 'friend' also says, Lohan bedded a string of men in a bid to suppress her lesbian urges â and to hide them from her public. The redhead supposedly sank into addictions as the pressure of her double life grew:
âFrom the start Lindsay was very confused about her feelings for Courtenay so did more and more drugs to stifle the sexual attraction she was experiencing. But eventually she just gave in and at every party theyâd kiss and touch each other in the corner. Itâs a miracle nobody found out. Both of them would do lines of cocaine in the toilets then head home and fall into bed together."
Throughout the following year, the pair stumbled through an on-again-off-again relationship as the troubled Lohan checked into a succession of rehab units and continued to date men as a âcoverâ.
Then in January 2007, saMAN Ronson entered the picture.
Snitchypoo said:
âBack then Samantha and Lindsay didnât have a physical relationship. She once said, âSamanthaâs the father I never hadâ! Apparently Samantha acted in a âpaternalâ way towards her, giving her advice and cuddles.â
At one point, the friend added, both Courtenay and Samantha were separately visiting Lindsay at celeb rehab hotspot Promises.
Lindsay was supposedly sending love notes to saMAN and signing them 'Lindsay Ronson' but telling Court she loved her too!
It gets juicier…
By October 2007, Courtenay appeared to have the upper hand.
She and Lindsay moved into a rented house in Beverly Hills BUT Lohan still continued to hook up with boys.
According to the insider:
âCourtenay would throw fits of rage, writing her hundreds of angry e-mails from another room in the house. The sexual attraction between them was electric though and theyâd still kiss and make up."
However, come December, Lindsay had bedded one man too many and, unable to take more humiliation, Courtenay moved out.
Guess who came back on the Lohan scene a week later?
Yup, the Man!
Semel's friend said, âCourtenay still canât understand how Lindsay is now so open with Samantha. Every time she sees a picture of them together it kills her.â
We don't think it will be long before La Lohan breaks saMAN's heart too!
[Images via WENN.]
|
| Slashdot's Disagree Mail | | I am responsible for reading most of the help requests sent to Slashdot. Most of the mail I get in a day is what you would expect, comments and concerns about postings, user accounts and Slashdot itself. There are a very special group however that get passed around the office due to the inordinate level of anger, lack of understanding and just plain weirdness they possess. Through the years I've collected many and still get such gems on a regular basis. We thought it would be fun to share some of our favorite rants, ramblings and ruminations with the rest of you. I give to you the first of many installments of Slashdot's disagree mail. The names have been changed to protect the idiot — hit the link below to drink it in. 
Read more of this story at Slashdot.

 |
| The Aggregated Me | The concept of aggregation is increasingly important on the Internet, as the sheer number of information resources increases. The average user wants to track more and more things on the Internet; an aggregator quickly becomes necessary as one's bookmark list grows to infinity. The first aggregators, what I call 'general purpose' aggregators, like Bloglines, Google Reader, and Newsgator, are focused on tracking blogs and news feeds, making it easy to subscribe to whatever blogs the user came across.
The new service FriendFeed has been getting a lot of attention the past couple of weeks. It's the latest in the line of what I call 'individual aggregators,' services that aggregate all the distributed parts of a person's on-line presence in one place. A person may have a blog, a Twitter account, a Flickr photostream. These services combine all of these items in one place. This trend started with Facebook's newsfeed, continued with Plaxo's Pulse, and then several other services, including Tumblr can do most of what the individual. These services are different than the general purpose aggregators in that they're focused on tracking individuals, not feeds. But the general purpose aggregators can do what the individual aggregators can do, because the underlying technology, RSS, is the same. It's really just a matter of user interfaces and a key bit of information.
The Problem
The individual aggregators collect a list of all of the distributed parts of a person's on-line presence. They ask each user to list their Twitter account, their Flickr account, their YouTube account, their blog. This list doesn't exist anywhere in a way that's machine readable. Each of the individual aggregators has to deduce this information and then maintain it. Or more specifically, each user has to maintain this information on each of the individual aggregators. Wouldn't it be better if this list existed somewhere under direct control of the user in a way where it wasn't siloed in a centralized, proprietary service? That way, every aggregator could take advantage of it and users would only have to update the list in one place.
A Modest Proposal
This problem is actually a general purpose version of a problem already solved by something called RSS Autodiscovery. In order to make it easier for general purpose aggregators to find RSS feeds to subscribe to, many publishers included a special line of text in the headers of their HTML. I have one on my blog:
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS" href="http://www.wingedpig.com/index.rdf" />
Aggregators know to look for this line, which tells them where the RSS feed for that blog exists. Can't we just extend this to include a list of all the other aspects of a person's identity? Have one line for each service the person uses, and change the title accordingly. So, I could include:
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Flickr Feed" href="http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?id=35034347955@N01&lang=en-us&format=rss_200" />
for my Flickr feed. This doesn't have to only apply to services that publish RSS feeds. I could even do something like:
<link rel="alternate" type="application/twitter" title="Twitter" href="wingedpig" />
to indicate my Twitter account.
By doing this, the list of all the parts of a person's on-line presence is kept under the control of the person, associated with their blog. It's distributed, open, and easy to implement.
How To Make It Work
For this to work, a couple things need to happen. Blog publishing software has to be modified to ask for and then insert this information into the headers of a person's blog. Then,aggregators need to be modified to look for this information, and to periodically recheck it. The general purpose aggregators need to augment their interfaces to allow people to subscribe to these new feeds. But none of these things are terribly difficult to do. |
| What's wrong with Wikipedia | First, I point to Wikipedia pages often here on Scripting News and on Twitter. I also find it a useful personal resource. For example, I'm working my way through Battlestar Galactica and I find it helpful to read the summary of each episode after I've watched it. It's great that they have a common format. And they fill in blanks you might not have noticed but don't spoil the plot of upcoming episodes. I've been investing in ETFs lately, and Wikipedia has helped me learn how they work. So I don't question its value. It has value.
Wikipedia is therefore a puzzle to me. Because while it's helpful, it also hurts me, because my biography there is more of a vendetta, by anonymous people, who seem self-centered and immature, but it's impossible to tell what axes they have to grind, because they're largely anonymous.
Same is true for various activities I've participated in. You may argue that I didn't invent this or that, but surely I had something to do with RSS, blogging and podcasting? Yet depending on when you look, I'm often not mentioned on these pages. This makes it hard for me to claim my work in professional dealings because people consider Wikipedia authoritative. What it says is considered by many to be the truth. So this has hurt my career, and my ability to do creative work that builds on past work.
This is where Andrew Keen could have and should have, imho, written his book. This is where the Cult of the Amateur really does do damage, by usurping authority, and replacing it with anonymity and giving power to those who who tear down creativity, to remove the incentive to share, unless you're completely selfless and don't mind if others take credit for your accomplishments. That's not the nature of creativity, btw, creative people fiercely insist on credit, fight for it, imho, rightly.
Eventually, if it hasn't already happened, there will be consultants you can pay to make sure your point of view dominates a Wikipedia page. It has already come out that a gift to the Wikipedia Foundation will assure that your point of view dominates your profile page. How much of this can Wikipedia stand before it is reformed? It seems time to have this discussion, and not in the confines of Wikipedia where it can be controlled and gamed by insiders, but outside where everyone's opinion can be heard without being edited out and when it's clear who's saying what.
That said, here's how I think Wikipedia should evolve to fix this problem.
Based on the principle that one has the right to confront his accusers, Wikipedia pages on living people, or covering active creative areas, should be limited to pages of pointers of attributed accounts. Editors work to validate that the people are who they say they are. If they can't be validated, they either don't get linked, or get linked to from an area specially marked as not being validated. (I prefer the former.)
Further, in areas important enough to be controversial, meaning that people disagree on what happened, we should try to get as many people who were involved in the event or activity to write first-person narratives. In areas where they all agree, that should eventually be considered fact and presented as such, but the first-person narratives must stay linked. This would prevent the kinds of disasters that happen when people (for example) edit their own profile pages, meanwhile giving people the formal right to tell their own story, which clearly, many people covered by Wikipedia want.
I hope an interesting discussion ensues. Of course I expect to hear from the people who edit my profile pages to keep my name in the dirt, and I don't expect them to use their actual names. Can't speak for everyone else, but I'm much more interested, always, in hearing opinions from people who have the conviction and courage to put their personal authority behind their words, as I do.
|
| American Idol Top 12 Boys And Top 12 Girls Compete | |
Now that the American Idol judges have narrowed down the contestants to the top twenty-four semifinalists, it is finally time for American viewers to have their say. Who among the top twelve boys and top twelve girls will make it to the all important top twelve overall?
The viewer voting part ... |
| Celebrity Sex Reviews | | Celebrity Sex Reviews
We’ve taken it upon ourselves to review the finest celebrity sex sites on the web to help you make a choice in your search for great nude celebs. There are a number of sites to choose from when search for those nude celebs so let us do the hard work and let yourself [...] | Celebrity Sex Reviews
We’ve taken it upon ourselves to review the finest celebrity sex sites on the web to help you make a choice in your search for great nude celebs. There are a number of sites to choose from when search for those nude celebs so let us do the hard work and let yourself enjoy the hot stuff.

|
| Behind NBCâs Olympics Website | | Eric Schmidt, one of the developers on NBCOlympics.com, the official Olympics Web site for the USA, just dropped by Fast Company’s offices in New York City for a chat. We used to work together at Microsoft. I turned on my cell phone and videoed Schmidt and we talked about the site and he gave me [...] |  |
| Samsung BlackJack Smartphone | IHit me! No, I'm not sitting on an ace-five hand with two Gs in the pot. I'm delirious with glee about my stuffed-to-the-gills BlackJack from Samsung. How could you not love bathing in all the geekified accessories in this package? There's a 1.3-megapixel digicam, Bluetooth, full QWERTY keyboard, instant messenger, Windows Media Player, microSD card slot, high-speed 3G connectivity, and side thumbwheel for easy navigation. Phew! After you sit down, have a glass of water, and get your bearings, you'll notice a few shortcomings: no touchscreen, no Palm OS, a clunky interface, and supershort battery life. Daily charging? Who has time for that? Still, it's a slick next-gen smartphone with more features than you'll probably need, and at least it's not called the BLKJCK. -- Erik Malinowski [RATING: 8/10] [RETAIL: $300 (with two-year Cingular contract)] [ samsungblackjack.com ]
|
| Making a Seamless Parchment Paper Background | |
Making a seamless tiling background is not as hard as it may seem especially when you make use of Photoshops offset filter. In this example, Ill use a stock image of some old-looking textured paper to make a seamless background appropriate for the content area of a web page. |
|
 |
|